Louisville

3–3 · ACC · 2–3 in rated games
#51
0.48
Compare →
Projected finish
7.1–4.9 expected
1% playoff
6% conf title game
0% first-round bye
<1%
3–9
1%
4–8
7%
5–7
21%
6–6
34%
7–5
28%
8–4
9%
9–3
bowl eligible 92% · win out 9%
Upcoming — tap a game to see what it moves
W7@ #92 Syracuse Syracusestakes 9
76%
What this game moves
PlayoffConf title game
if SYRif LOUif SYRif LOU
Louisville<1%2%<1%8%
Syracuse————
Ole Miss40%43%——
SMU——24%20%
W9vs #100 Stanford Stanfordstakes 4
88%
W10@ #96 Georgia Tech Georgia Techstakes 12
67%
W11@ #38 North Carolina North Carolinastakes 10
61%
W12vs #31 Pittsburgh Pittsburghstakes 20
66%
W13@ #14 Kentucky Kentuckystakes 41
49%
The receipts
WkOpponentResultPerfStrTot±
—Model prior · 20% weight+0.18
W1n #15 Ole Miss Ole MissL 38–41652953−0.00
W2vs Villanova · not ratedW 59–13———0.00
W3vs #45 SMU SMUW 41–31617370+0.45
W4vs #25 Wake Forest Wake ForestL 27–30541640−0.30
W5@ #94 NC State NC StateL 28–3145931−0.50
W6vs #60 Florida State Florida StateW 44–20767480+0.66
Season total✓ receipts = résumé score0.48
Factor profile
Rush offPass offRush defPass def
Rush offense
1675 #16
Pass offense
1586 #38
Rush defense
1587 #37
Pass defense
1445 #91

Who this team is — style, not standing. These don't feed the rankings. The radar shows where each unit sits nationally.

Résumé profile
Résumé score
0.48 #51
Elo
1620 #38
WAB
-1.6 #83
SOS
1586 #26

What the season has earned — the board's four metrics. The receipts itemize the score game by game.

Trajectory
#25#45#64W1W3W5W6
Compare →