UTSA

5–1 · Amer · 4–1 in rated games
#47
0.80
Compare →
Projected finish
8.8–3.2 expected
3% playoff
41% conf title game
0% first-round bye
<1%
5–7
2%
6–6
11%
7–5
26%
8–4
33%
9–3
22%
10–2
6%
11–1
10+ wins 28% · win out 6%
Upcoming — tap a game to see what it moves
W7vs #93 Navy Navystakes 20
67%
What this game moves
PlayoffConf title game
if UTSAif NAVYif UTSAif NAVY
UTSA5%1%52%20%
Navy——<1%10%
Memphis——46%51%
East Carolina——20%24%
W8@ #97 Tulane Tulanestakes 22
51%
W10@ #59 Florida Atlantic Florida Atlanticstakes 25
50%
W11vs #55 North Texas North Texasstakes 28
59%
W12@ #111 UAB UABstakes 16
74%
W13vs #95 Tulsa Tulsastakes 16
78%
The receipts
WkOpponentResultPerfStrTot±
—Model prior · 25% weight−0.20
W1vs UT Rio Grande Valley · not ratedW 45–16———0.00
W2@ #90 Texas State Texas StateW 31–26577468+0.42
W3@ #9 Texas TexasL 6–30483846−0.11
W4vs #103 Colorado State Colorado StateW 59–45516660+0.24
W5@ #128 Rice RiceW 16–14426755+0.15
W6vs #70 South Florida South FloridaW 31–24526962+0.30
Season total✓ receipts = résumé score0.80
Factor profile
Rush offPass offRush defPass def
Rush offense
1710 #10
Pass offense
1401 #102
Rush defense
1470 #76
Pass defense
1494 #70

Who this team is — style, not standing. These don't feed the rankings. The radar shows where each unit sits nationally.

Résumé profile
Résumé score
0.80 #47
Elo
1502 #63
WAB
0.2 #25
SOS
1476 #86

What the season has earned — the board's four metrics. The receipts itemize the score game by game.

Trajectory
#46#57#67W1W3W5W6
Compare →